5.1.3 SMTP bounce: bad address syntax
What 5.1.3 means
The recipient address is syntactically invalid, so the receiver cannot parse it.
Message text
Bad destination mailbox address syntax
Common causes of 5.1.3
- Invalid characters or missing @ in the recipient address
How to fix 5.1.3
- Re-type the recipient address.
- Check the address format in the sending application.
Check your domain
Read the headers of a bounced messageRuns in your browser; nothing is uploaded.
Have the full bounce message? Paste it into the bounce code lookup and it will match the code and the provider for you. Open the bounce code lookup.
How to read 5.1.3
The second part, 5.1.3, is an enhanced status code (RFC 3463 §2) written class.subject.detail. Class 5 is a Permanent failure (5xx): the command was rejected and the sender should not repeat it unchanged (RFC 5321 §4.2.1; RFC 3463 §2).. Subject 1 is addressing: a problem with the recipient or sender address. The detail number refines the subject, and providers may define details of their own, which is why one code can read differently at Gmail, Microsoft and Yahoo.
Do not keep resending the same message: a permanent failure repeats until the cause is fixed. Correct the cause, then send a new message.
Official source: www.rfc-editor.org. Last verified 2026-10-20.
Related guides
- How to set up MX records (priorities, null MX, migration)
- MX host does not resolve: causes and how to fix it
- Null MX (RFC 7505): publish it for domains with no mail
Related codes
- 5.1.1 SMTP: bad destination mailbox
- 5.1.2 SMTP: bad destination system
- 5.1.10 SMTP: recipient has null MX
- 550 5.1.1 Microsoft: bad mailbox address
- 550 5.1.10 Microsoft: recipient not found
- 550 SMTP: mailbox unavailable
FAQ
What does 5.1.3 mean?
The recipient address is syntactically invalid, so the receiver cannot parse it. This is a permanent failure.
How do I fix 5.1.3?
Re-type the recipient address. Check the address format in the sending application.
Is 5.1.3 permanent, and should I retry?
5.1.3 is a permanent failure, so retrying the same message will fail again. Fix the cause first, then send a new message.